Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
add repair ship and crew lvl
- Attachments
-
- Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts.CT
- (24.92 KiB) Downloaded 329 times
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
This needs an update with the new major update which breaks the weight and cost cheats.
-
- What is cheating?
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 5:02 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
I cant get the weight/cost functions to work. I enabled mono features like it said on page 1 and still no dice. Using the table from aug 10 above. Can anyone help, or is the table's weight functions currently broken?
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
I corrected the table from Cyo15092 in terms of weight and cost. They seem to be working.
- Attachments
-
- Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts.CT
- (25.66 KiB) Downloaded 320 times
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
update to 1.6.0.1
added "add ammo to selected ship in battle"
added "add ammo to selected ship in battle"
- Attachments
-
- Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts.CT
- (28.24 KiB) Downloaded 966 times
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
I noticed a very minor issue with 1.6.1.1 in that when the weight is turned off, the ships still show as underweight. The only way to get them back to normal weight is to "view" the ship and then I guess it recalculates the ship's weight. Not a big deal, but a bit of extra time if you're building 100 ships.
Edit: Also noting this table has broken with the latest update 1.6.1.2 (Nov 1, 2024)
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
tested on version 1.6.1.3 live optx6
add:
refresh veigh in ship design to low value
add:
refresh veigh in ship design to low value
- Attachments
-
- Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts.CT
- 1.6.1.3 live optx6
- (34.45 KiB) Downloaded 574 times
-
- Noobzor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2024 6:52 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
is anyone able to get the newest table to work or am i missing something?
-
- What is cheating?
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 5:02 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
seems to be working fine for me...did you activate mono features after loading the table?
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
1.7.0.0
added
PROCENT BUDRZET to 50% only player world
player world no expenses
no maintenance player ship only
battle page with ammo and reloading options that have options to set who they work on
edit 17.01.2025
change last added options witch -x% now the scripts are not op and you can set them as needed
added
PROCENT BUDRZET to 50% only player world
player world no expenses
no maintenance player ship only
battle page with ammo and reloading options that have options to set who they work on
edit 17.01.2025
change last added options witch -x% now the scripts are not op and you can set them as needed
- Attachments
-
- Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts.CT
- 1.7.0.0 v.0.1
- (380.64 KiB) Downloaded 804 times
Re: Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts
Is there a way to make certain hulls non-obsolete?
I really hate when the game forces you to eschew the smallest torpedoboat (which is good for backwater guard ships), smallest destroyer hull (which makes the best minelayers), the torpedo-cruiser hull (which is just nice compact torpedo-escort), smallest CL and CA-hulls and the small dreadnought-hull (pocket-battleship hull for colonial use) and would very much have them back...
I really hate when the game forces you to eschew the smallest torpedoboat (which is good for backwater guard ships), smallest destroyer hull (which makes the best minelayers), the torpedo-cruiser hull (which is just nice compact torpedo-escort), smallest CL and CA-hulls and the small dreadnought-hull (pocket-battleship hull for colonial use) and would very much have them back...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Google Adsense [Bot], llzxyll, spillingreverie