Was off to Prague for a few days; quite nice indeed. Here's my reply, hopefully short, to all the shit you've been spewing:
Again, Denuvo is supposedly adding anti-cheats. They don't ask YOU how they will accomplish this or how the ANTICHEATS part of their services will exhibit itself into games. You are assuming they will do this the same way they do their DRM stuff, or that this part of their 'services' is even done by the same people. You literally have no idea, and neither do we. I admit that I don't know either. But 100 paragraphs telling me what you think you know about Denuvo DRM doesn't mean jack for Denuvo anticheats (or maybe it does and will), but the fact is that you don't know.
Let me stop at 'supposedly'. I asked "are you aware Denuvo is relying on VMProtect?"; what are you telling me now? Show me the reversed VM of a function that you were able to piece together from a Denuvo target, then we talk who knows what. Considering I am asking, yes, I don't know. Point here is SO DO YOU (not know). Somehow I fail to think Denuvo is that stupid not to mutate/virtualize their code or FUTURE anti-cheat, as you put it, given what I've seen so far.
"Proof or shut the fuck up." applies to you too. Nobody knows, is the truth. You also have no idea what tools we use or what proprietary things we have at CE to do our work.
Didn't know you work for CE
now. Proprietary tools? Listen, fuckwad, the fact that you use shit from stackoverflow or github doesn't make it proprietary. But sure, by all means, if you have the owners' approval, then consider that 'proprietary'.
Second, you know what you did, and it was taken down here. STN also knows what you did, and he was involved in removing it.
STN removed it for a brief time; he then agreed it has no harmful effects to other people than CH (apparently). Wonder why FLiNG isn't affected or other trainers.. Bottom line is the Lua script was aimed at fucking setting a user-mode breakpoint on a WINDOWS API: WriteProcessMemory. You don't own that shit; you don't get to tell me what I can write or not, what I can post or not and so on.. Why the fuck are you still using that API and why the fuck this old 2005 fucking argument causes mayhem in 2018 eludes me. But hey, don't let me tell you how to code anti-API hooking techniques. Figure it out on your own; you have 'proprietary' tools. FLiNG did it. Guess you don't want to learn from his knowledge, eh? If you wanna be #1 at what you do, for sure there will be fuckers like me setting that haystack on fire; just so you remember where you stand. Grow the fuck up, upgrade your shit, then we won't have this crappy talk over code you can't shield properly. Given you bang this argument hard, I believe it's important enough to spend time on it. Don't you think? Evolution. Hoping you do that. Thank me later.
Yes, many people have benefited from your 'spilling the beans' or your actual original works. I personally have benefited from things you have posted or released, as I am sure others have benefited from me. However, the truth is that many people also lost valuable methods, lost tons of time, or lost money, or are damaged by it. I've never tried to harm a website directly or a game company by destroying their DRM, or releasing their software in a way that others can use it for free, or tried to release cracks of people's software, ever. That's not just 'fun coding releases', that's 'war'.
Before you had a job, you liked the war others were fighting to get you your fucking SIMS game cracked on CD. Since you're now co-owner of CH, you give a fuck and turn this around: us, reversers, are the bad guys; you're just a good guy, training games and nothing else. Oh boo-fucking-hoo. Convenient, isn't it?
"This "good cop - bad cop" ping-pong won't help you."<-- hehehe. SELF ABSORBED. Help me from what? Like all of this is somehow about you. YOU injected yourself into this, not me.
I wasn't the one posting "we at CH can bypass this" on FRF, BEFORE I intercepted your post, now, was I? If people asked your help in private, as you claim, then take it in PMs. I surely haven't seen any "Caliber, please help us" post on the forums. Who injected himself where? Come on, accept this token of gratitude as well: "you were the FIRST" starting this shit. Told you to stop gloating here; since you can't manifest your arrogance on your own forums, trainer taken down and all, you thought FRF would be the best spot to do it?..
We are putting out tons of content, and don't spend 3 days on a single title reversing it for 'fun'.
Yet you did. Thanks for the "self-absorbing" PM; your proved your point. Let me congratulate you in your own style: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6334&p=40609#p40609
. Hope you understand when people mean what they say and when they don't. That is just an example of utter sarcasm; I'll let others read it and tell me what they think afterward. If I'm mistaking, then I will apologize.
P.S.: Speaking of which.. at least I do something with the knowledge I learn or discover; the EAC bypass got universal for Ubisoft titles (might work with other games, depends on the size of the EAC's exports table), doesn't need to touch the game at all - - so no more in-memory patching - - I remember how PWiz clinged on to that "we never touch the executable" line; so moronic). Yes, available in fearlessrevolution. People are not afraid to drop a 3 KB DLL instead of the original one and restore it later, if they've need to play online.
Just a side note, I never put CH or advertised, or anything when I made the posting to help.
. Oh we know your usual post content. Etiquette, man; deal with it.
Curious about me and fearlessrevolution?
Yes, ask Frank.
P.S.: Post what you PM-ed me publicly; stay true to your word, that you wanted to help. Here's your chance to own me publicly; you know you want to. Else, we get back to the same crap we've been discussing here: your intentions. And more bashing.