FearLess Cheat Engine

ironman69 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:54 am

almago wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:36 pm

Im using this right now, no DLL just inject

Also wondering if there is a update on this Table I'm using in my Attachment, i cant seem to remember where i got it from or who created it
---------------------------------
How to use
1. Open CT
2. Memory View > Search for 0x180000000 and Click Ok
3. Hit Inject (Purple Text)
4. Open Helldiver 2
5. Activate cheat when you see Black Screen
6. Close CE asap

may i ask if this is still working after the lastest patch. thanks

Still working

arborium wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:11 am

Does anyone have a Super Damage script ? The one i was using is crashing the game after the patch, this one:
[ENABLE]

aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(number,4)

label(code)
label(enemy)
label(return)
label(Pcheck)

number:
dd 0

newmem:
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne enemy

Pcheck:
movss [number],xmm0
cmp [number],42fa0000
ja enemy
jmp code

enemy:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp return

code:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

[ENABLE]
aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(Value,4)

label(Target)
label(Self)
label(Return)
label(Value)

Value:
dd 0

newmem:
neg eax
cmp r13d,eax
cmovg eax,r13d
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne Target

movss [Value],xmm0
cmp [Value],42fa0000
ja Target
jmp Self

Target:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp Return

Self:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp Return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
Return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

twaeza wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:04 pm

Spoiler

Is this supposed to be impressive or something? You know we have scripts to instantly complete the mission and then exfil in a second. What's the purpose of this?

gir489 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:15 pm

What's the purpose of this?

..to tease little kids and "look at me, I'm the most awesome haxx0r in the game". Then they wonder why we don't spoon feed them..

Meanwhile, I dunno what they did, but I love that they did: I can run the game unpacked and no GameGuard on any PC now. Yet another case of Themida used wrong - click, click, click, game protected. Not to mention game.dll itself is just packed, nothing virtualized 'n' shit. Kind of lame seeing the same mistakes and patterns across years. That's what happens when you have zero background in reverse-engineering and just play "click-clack" with commercial protector buttons T_T..

SunBeam wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:56 pm

gir489 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:15 pm

What's the purpose of this?

..to tease little kids and "look at me, I'm the most awesome haxx0r in the game". Then they wonder why we don't spoon feed them..

Yeah, I'm tired of releasing shit for this game, only for it to end up in SuperKid9000's Super Awesome Mega Table v18 with my header taken out so they don't have to credit me. I've met at least 3 people who think I didn't make the 'Show All Map Icons' script. I moved on to other games, can't be fucked with this shit anymore.

There's always going to be some little kid wanting to look cool or being regarded as PRO in front of others. That's why there's the common reaction of feeling belittled when someone else that has more knowledge than them talks them down. That's their escape in front of an audience: "instead of helping, you've belittled me". No, bitch, I did help: this way you know not to exert the bragging attitude in these parts.

I've been shown samples of people are selling cfemen's work in Discords, so that he had to add a fucking disclaimer they can't edit or remove T_T..

But then again, I was nice enough to ask how much time is this game still going to be popular for, hacking-wise, because my idea is super simple: release everything, how to unpack the game, kill GameGuard, etc. so that the developers get off their comfy seats and fucking change the logic so that there will be proper server-client checks. Then no one will whine anymore, cuz they won't be able to cheat anymore. Problem solved. And I don't give a fuck if I'm the one who got their hacking patched.

Ya'll sound like whiny kids when you don't get credit lol

No offense, but you lurk around the scene for 20 years and you just get used to it. No one's gonna remember Joe shmo who reverse engineered the AC of a game that was only popular for 5-6 years. When rhe game is dead, you'll all be forgotten.

Hell, look at l4d2. I doubt yall can name a single important person in the l4d2 hacking community but that games been around for almost 16 years now.

Either you get used to the shared bullshittery that is game hacking or you find something where you WILL get recognition. Maybe give drm reverse engineering a shot. Every remembers those people.

Complaining that you're not getting credit does not further discussions nor is it relevant.

Dekutheguy wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:37 pm

...

It seems to me you're barking at the wrong tree. I can tell when people don't get enough attention by the simple bringing into conversation of off-topics: "look at <insert here a topic of his/her interest>". If you're so keen on your subject, just debate it there. But wait, there isn't such a place for your nice L4D2 so you barge in other topics. Problem with most of y'allz is you're judging a person by 1 post they write in 1 topic; you rarely look at their profile, their past.. but at the same time, you do want us to consider you someone So, "politely" (that's what TikTok generation uses today; so I'm adapting), can you fuck off?

thats why people wont share hack because of that shit people, just leech..
its has been place there the author etc...

why its bother them to delete that part, and re-share..
what is the intentional..

thats why the best place to share is p2c with authentication ( even its still get leech by some shit )..
and when its all get patched, dont cry and begging for author to release their hack, bypass etc..


ive been waiting another game like Dragon Dogma 2, its more enjoyable..coop / multi things to many toxic..haha

emoisback wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:23 pm

thats why people wont share hack because of that shit people, just leech..
its has been place there the author etc...

why its bother them to delete that part, and re-share..
what is the intentional..

thats why the best place to share is p2c with authentication ( even its still get leech by some shit )..
and when its all get patched, dont cry and begging for author to release their hack, bypass etc..


ive been waiting another game like Dragon Dogma 2, its more enjoyable..coop / multi things to many toxic..haha

"too many toxic", 100% agreed.

cfemen mentioned he won't DRM (put any authentication, etc) because he hates it but it's just sad people does stuff like this but hey, better not "gatekeep" stuff or some people will be mad but anyway, it is what it is, people won't change.

as I mentioned earlier, it's an endless cat 'n' mouse game, samples are now server sided, let's see what they'll do next.

kkpcn001 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:34 am

arborium wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:11 am

Does anyone have a Super Damage script ? The one i was using is crashing the game after the patch, this one:
[ENABLE]

aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(number,4)

label(code)
label(enemy)
label(return)
label(Pcheck)

number:
dd 0

newmem:
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne enemy

Pcheck:
movss [number],xmm0
cmp [number],42fa0000
ja enemy
jmp code

enemy:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp return

code:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

[ENABLE]
aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(Value,4)

label(Target)
label(Self)
label(Return)
label(Value)

Value:
dd 0

newmem:
neg eax
cmp r13d,eax
cmovg eax,r13d
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne Target

movss [Value],xmm0
cmp [Value],42fa0000
ja Target
jmp Self

Target:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp Return

Self:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp Return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
Return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

The script is not working, it doesn’t even appear in the table

kkpcn001 wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:34 am

arborium wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:11 am

Does anyone have a Super Damage script ? The one i was using is crashing the game after the patch, this one:
[ENABLE]

aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(number,4)

label(code)
label(enemy)
label(return)
label(Pcheck)

number:
dd 0

newmem:
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne enemy

Pcheck:
movss [number],xmm0
cmp [number],42fa0000
ja enemy
jmp code

enemy:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp return

code:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

[ENABLE]
aobscanmodule(ohk,game.dll,F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00)
registersymbol(ohk)
alloc(newmem,$1000,ohk)

alloc(Value,4)

label(Target)
label(Self)
label(Return)
label(Value)

Value:
dd 0

newmem:
neg eax
cmp r13d,eax
cmovg eax,r13d
cmp [rdi+B38],A
jne Target

movss [Value],xmm0
cmp [Value],42fa0000
ja Target
jmp Self

Target:
mov [rdi+00006444],0
jmp Return

Self:
mov [rdi+00006444],eax
jmp Return

ohk:
jmp newmem
nop
Return:


[DISABLE]

ohk:
db F7 D8 44 3B E8 41 0F 4F C5 89 87 44 64 00 00

unregistersymbol(ohk)
dealloc(newmem)

Not working my brother, im new, i just changed the script in the CE but it's not working.

SunBeam wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:22 pm

Dekutheguy wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:37 pm

...

It seems to me you're barking at the wrong tree. I can tell when people don't get enough attention by the simple bringing into conversation of off-topics: "look at <insert here a topic of his/her interest>". If you're so keen on your subject, just debate it there. But wait, there isn't such a place for your nice L4D2 so you barge in other topics. Problem with most of y'allz is you're judging a person by 1 post they write in 1 topic; you rarely look at their profile, their past.. but at the same time, you do want us to consider you someone So, "politely" (that's what TikTok generation uses today; so I'm adapting), can you fuck off?

My nigga, the very fact you responded to this is proof enough you need to stop. I brought up l4d2 as a valid point, and If I wanted to talk bout it in a real constructive way it wouldn't be fucking here lol. Get a life or better yet, stop looking at tiktok.

SunBeam wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:22 pm

Dekutheguy wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:37 pm

...

It seems to me you're barking at the wrong tree. I can tell when people don't get enough attention by the simple bringing into conversation of off-topics: "look at <insert here a topic of his/her interest>". If you're so keen on your subject, just debate it there. But wait, there isn't such a place for your nice L4D2 so you barge in other topics. Problem with most of y'allz is you're judging a person by 1 post they write in 1 topic; you rarely look at their profile, their past.. but at the same time, you do want us to consider you someone So, "politely" (that's what TikTok generation uses today; so I'm adapting), can you fuck off?

Dude stop being a pussy

Dekutheguy wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:40 pm

as a valid point

Yeah, it's valid only when you write. When others do that and you don't like what you read, it's suddenly not valid Respectfully... <insert whatever you want here> (I suggest what the user above said)