Community Cheat Tables of Cheat Engine
http://fearlessrevolution.com/
Can i at least give away the injection address, would that much be taboo?ReDragonInc wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:02 pmThat would be stealing, yes. Without permission and credit, it'd be taboo.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:36 pmTbh i have an Infinite HP and SP script, but its been "appropriated" from a famous website, is it alright to post something like that?
Nobody can really lay claim of ownership to memory addresses, I mean come on now...qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:07 pmCan i at least give away the injection address, would that much be taboo?ReDragonInc wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:02 pmThat would be stealing, yes. Without permission and credit, it'd be taboo.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:36 pmTbh i have an Infinite HP and SP script, but its been "appropriated" from a famous website, is it alright to post something like that?
It's entirely up to you. I'm not going to complain.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:07 pmCan i at least give away the injection address, would that much be taboo?ReDragonInc wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:02 pmThat would be stealing, yes. Without permission and credit, it'd be taboo.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:36 pmTbh i have an Infinite HP and SP script, but its been "appropriated" from a famous website, is it alright to post something like that?
The problem would be not claiming the code. But posting it as his own when he did not do the work, that's the taboo. The effort someone else put into it is why.KS212 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:28 pmNobody can really lay claim of ownership to memory addresses, I mean come on now...qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:07 pmCan i at least give away the injection address, would that much be taboo?ReDragonInc wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:02 pm
That would be stealing, yes. Without permission and credit, it'd be taboo.
Posting their full code w/o consent is taboo, posting a memory address is fine.
Is jumping cleaner than nop?TheByteSize wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:16 amInf SPCode: Select all
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <CheatTable> <CheatEntries> <CheatEntry> <ID>8</ID> <Description>"Inf SP"</Description> <LastState Activated="1"/> <VariableType>Auto Assembler Script</VariableType> <AssemblerScript>[ENABLE] aobscanmodule(SAOHR_InfSP,sao_hr.exe,66 44 89 41 10 C3) // should be unique alloc(newmem,$1000,SAOHR_InfSP) label(code) label(return) newmem: jmp return code: mov [rcx+10],r8w jmp return SAOHR_InfSP: jmp newmem return: registersymbol(SAOHR_InfSP) [DISABLE] SAOHR_InfSP: db 66 44 89 41 10 unregistersymbol(SAOHR_InfSP) dealloc(newmem) { // ORIGINAL CODE - INJECTION POINT: "sao_hr.exe"+26A93C "sao_hr.exe"+26A91F: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A920: 44 0F BF 41 10 - movsx r8d,word ptr [rcx+10] "sao_hr.exe"+26A925: 44 03 C2 - add r8d,edx "sao_hr.exe"+26A928: 79 07 - jns sao_hr.exe+26A931 "sao_hr.exe"+26A92A: 33 C0 - xor eax,eax "sao_hr.exe"+26A92C: 66 89 41 10 - mov [rcx+10],ax "sao_hr.exe"+26A930: C3 - ret "sao_hr.exe"+26A931: 0F BF 41 12 - movsx eax,word ptr [rcx+12] "sao_hr.exe"+26A935: 41 3B C0 - cmp eax,r8d "sao_hr.exe"+26A938: 44 0F 4C C0 - cmovl r8d,eax // ---------- INJECTING HERE ---------- "sao_hr.exe"+26A93C: 66 44 89 41 10 - mov [rcx+10],r8w // ---------- DONE INJECTING ---------- "sao_hr.exe"+26A941: C3 - ret "sao_hr.exe"+26A942: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A943: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A944: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A945: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A946: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A947: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A948: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A949: CC - int 3 "sao_hr.exe"+26A94A: CC - int 3 } </AssemblerScript> </CheatEntry> </CheatEntries> </CheatTable>
nop is cleaner.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:33 am
Is jumping cleaner than nop?
Also, do you mind if I add this to the current table?
Hmm unless its been told not to share by the owner, if not just list out the credit to the person when you wanna share it.qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:36 pmTbh i have an Infinite HP and SP script, but its been "appropriated" from a famous website, is it alright to post something like that?
This reminds me of back in the PS1/PS2 days when there was competition between Action Replay and Codebreaker and ppl were encrypting codes to prevent theft, heh. At the end of the day, there was no onus on proof that you found the memory addresses yourself. Additionally nobody can lay 'claim' to a memory address as theirs. ie you can't say 'I found inf HP first! you have to find another location/address and can't use mine!' because there ISN'T another location... the memory addresses are public domain for anyone to discover. Once its been discovered, the cat isn't going back in the bag.ReDragonInc wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:16 am
The problem would be not claiming the code. But posting it as his own when he did not do the work, that's the taboo. The effort someone else put into it is why.KS212 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:28 pmNobody can really lay claim of ownership to memory addresses, I mean come on now...qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:07 pm
Can i at least give away the injection address, would that much be taboo?
Posting their full code w/o consent is taboo, posting a memory address is fine.
I was just thinking out loud, I already appreciate the load of options you've given us very much!qweasdzxc17 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:33 pmWaaaaay beyond my skill level.cdtrico wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:07 pmI wonder if there's a way to make buffs last infinitely,or something like making overdrive's buff duration not 20% but some insane number like 100000% or something, since having to reapply buffs all the time is so ugh.
Although i'm just being lazy to be fair.
Code: Select all
{ Game : sao_hr.exe
Version:
Date : 2017-11-01
Author : qweasdzxc17
This script does blah blah blah
}
[ENABLE]
aobscanmodule(SAO_INFHP,sao_hr.exe,44 89 01 C3 CC) // should be unique
registersymbol(SAO_INFHP)
SAO_INFHP:
db 90 90 90
[DISABLE]
SAO_INFHP:
db 44 89 01
unregistersymbol(SAO_INFHP)
{
// ORIGINAL CODE - INJECTION POINT: "sao_hr.exe"+26A8F8
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8DC: 41 5E - pop r14
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8DE: C3 - ret
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8DF: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8E0: 44 8B 01 - mov r8d,[rcx]
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8E3: 44 03 C2 - add r8d,edx
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8E6: 79 07 - jns sao_hr.exe+26A8EF
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8E8: C7 01 00 00 00 00 - mov [rcx],00000000
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8EE: C3 - ret
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8EF: 44 39 41 04 - cmp [rcx+04],r8d
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8F3: 44 0F 4C 41 04 - cmovl r8d,[rcx+04]
// ---------- INJECTING HERE ----------
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8F8: 44 89 01 - mov [rcx],r8d
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8FB: C3 - ret
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8FC: CC - int 3
// ---------- DONE INJECTING ----------
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8FD: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8FE: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A8FF: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A900: 83 C1 32 - add ecx,32
"sao_hr.exe"+26A903: 45 85 C0 - test r8d,r8d
"sao_hr.exe"+26A906: 0F 88 C4 D0 F1 FF - js sao_hr.exe+1879D0
"sao_hr.exe"+26A90C: E9 CF D0 F1 FF - jmp sao_hr.exe+1879E0
"sao_hr.exe"+26A911: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A912: CC - int 3
"sao_hr.exe"+26A913: CC - int 3
}Crap..