Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 9:02AM |
4 Comments
The moment everybody in the GMO battle has been waiting for. Whole Foods has decided to support California Prop. 37. This Prop will require the labeling of GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) in California. And because of the size of the Californian market it will have implications for the entire country. Most of what Whole Foods sells is not organic and so much of it contains GMOs. What to many would seem like a no-brainer for Whole Foods is actually a monumental decision so there is surely a lot of hand wringing in Austin going on. But I believe that it was the only decision they could make if they hoped to stay on mission and continue to be the brand that Americans trust most on food and food issues. Below is how they described their decision and some of their concerns with the fine print of Prop. 37:
Whole Foods Market supports California’s Proposition 37 requiring mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods by January 1, 2014 because it has long believed its customers have the right to know how their food is produced. However, the company has some reservations with the bill as drafted and hopes several issues can be addressed in the implementation phase should voters approve the measure, including:
Because of the inconsistency in thresholds and the lack of Attorney General oversight, manufacturers could be compelled to label products with “May be Partially Produced with Genetic Engineering” even if it is not the case to avoid costly litigation and protect themselves. This could result in consumers receiving inaccurate information, which is contrary to the intent of the bill itself.
Additionally, Whole Foods Market is encouraged by the parallel effort in Washington State with their proposed Initiative Measure No. 522 as it already addresses some of the concerns of California’s Proposition 37. These two state initiatives could possibly lead to a broader effort to create one federal standard on labeling of genetically engineered foods similar to how the National Organic Standards were formed. One set of rules and uniform support of a consumer’s right to know would ultimately be in the best interest of all.
Learn more at California Right To Know.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 9:02AM |
4 Comments 

Reader Comments (4)
Excellent.
Just a little aside ~ His Holiness the Dalai Lama eats meat (organic of course)!! :D
Blessings~
Congratulations to WFM for finally growing a pair! Now, if only the NPA would quit fearing for their namesake and do the right thing...
Interesting article. I still find it ironic though that my employer (Whole Foods) backed 37 though, since a lot (50% maybe?) of products we sell are made by companies that are owned by companies that Monsanto owns huge shares of. I think Anti-GMO extremists come off as kooks, but it doesn't mean they're wrong...
Yeah, sure, it SEEMS like they support GMO labeling, but are they actually donating anything like the mom and pop brands/small organic farms? Whole Foods continues to sell GMO foods (unlabeled), which then stuffs money back into Monsanto's pockets as they support GM crops (when farmers are forced to buy Monsanto's seeds due to lack of non-GM options)....Whole Foods can simply choose not to sell GMO foods and until then, they do not get my support.