Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...



Twitter Facebook RSS YouTube Pinterest Vimeo Sign Up for FearLess News

Join the FearLess Revolution!

FearLess Revolution is dedicated to catalyzing conversations in health and sustainability, and exploring new, more meaningful relationships between people, brands and culture.

We're seeing a dramatic shift in the way business is done toward more transparency, collaboration, democracy, innovation - and ultimately more value. FearLess Revolution brings new ideas, inspiring stories, dynamic tools and practical resources to empower our communities and local economies.

FearLess Revolution is a project of the Living Green Foundation, a nonprofit, 501(c)3 organization.

The authors of our blog are friends, collaborators and change-making leaders in their respective fields.

     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

CATEGORIES

SEARCH SITE

The Real Significance of the #Occupy Movement


About six months ago, I wrote about the need for a new progressive political narrative, one rooted in possibilities and human potential rather than demonizing the opposition and shrill exclamations of failed policy.  As we move into the fourth week of the now nationwide Occupy Movement, I think we may have found it.

Consider these words from Congressman Peter King (R-NY):

We have to be careful not to allow this to get any legitimacy,’ King warned. ‘I’m taking this seriously in that I’m old enough to remember what happened in the 1960′s when the left-wing took to the streets and somehow the media glorified them and it ended up shaping policy. We can’t allow that to happen.

Shaping policy.  If you know your American history, you know the sort of policy-shaping that happened in the 1960s, courtesy of the Civil Rights Movement, the Women’s Movement and the anti-Vietnam protests, all things that most of us can agree helped move the country forward.  When a conservative Republican Congressman grants such weight, seriousness and, ironically, legitimacy to the Occupy Movement, it means that we had better pay attention.

The Occupy Movement is bigger than anger, bigger than “dirty hippies“, bigger than class warfare, bigger than unemployment, bigger than million-dollar bonuses and trillion-dollar bailouts, bigger in fact than everything you’ve been told, and it could indeed “shape policy” for years to come.

The Occupy Movement is about the brokenness of our institutions and their colossal, collective failure to serve the needs of ordinary people.

It is not, as some pundits are saying, the left-wing version of the Tea Party.  This movement may be rooted in progressive ideals, but its message has the potential to transcend partisanship and polarity, tapping into the very real frustrations and suffering of ordinary Americans--in the movement’s own words, the 99 percent--on both the left and right.  Not unlike the narratives of the Tea Party, the Occupy Movement stands for the right of everyone to a fair shot at happiness and a level playing field, and in this sense it is unifying, not divisive.

Umair Haque calls it part of a Metamovement.  I daresay it’s the beginnings of a great institutional awakening in America, the birth of a new political and cultural narrative that is not about left vs. right, tax increases vs. tax cuts, or who is responsible for high unemployment, but about institutions that were meant to serve us and the many ways that they have failed.

Movements cannot, for better or for worse, be sustained on facts and refutations alone.  Movements live or die based on the narratives and metanarratives they weave and their relevance within culture.  We are human beings, after all, not encyclopedias, and our understanding of the world and our place within it is inseparable from the stories we tell to ourselves and to one another.

A powerful, relevant narrative has long been absent from American progressivism. Occupy Wall Street is that narrative. And if it persists, it could change everything.

If it persists and if it remains nonviolent.  I hope these are not big if’s, because this movement is a chance to do something great.  To shape policy.  I will leave you, then, with another quote, this time from Mahatma Ghandi:

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.



By Robin Cangie



References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: hay day guide
    FearLess Revolution - FearLess Blog - The Real Significance of the #Occupy Movement

Reader Comments (4)

I was born with a sense....like a one-eyed-cyclops in a world of the blind. I've been ignored, laughed at, fought at.....but it's all worth it as many are "seeing" now. Be encouraged; be brave. In the end the win goes to all who choose to "see".


Blessings ~

October 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterIN-B-TWEEN

The civil rights movement indeed did lead to policy changes - the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The women's movement almost did - the Equal Rights Amendment made it through Congress but did not get ratified by the states.

However, the anti-war movement was responsible for only a single political change - the decision of LBJ to drop out of the race for the Presidency in 1968. That's it - that's all they accomplished. The Vietnam War was brought to an end by Henry Kissinger and Lê Đức Thọ, not by any "policy change" brought about as a result of the anti-war movement. Congressman King's memory of the 1960s, like everyone's, is selective.

Incidentally, there's another movement that did have a profound impact on policy - the environmental movement. It was relatively peaceful and led in part by scientists. Perhaps that's the model that this movement should use, if the goal is policy changes. Get some scientists and economists on your side

Sadly, I don't see that now. I see anger and frustration, statements like "The Occupy Movement is about the brokenness of our institutions and their colossal, collective failure to serve the needs of ordinary people", bizarre out-of-context statistics like "we are the 99%" for whom "the system has failed", and so on.

In short, I see nothing but mostly leftist anti-corporate propaganda extracted from trends in the distribution of incomes and wealth. And, of course, I see rants like Congressman King's and conservative propaganda to counter, taken mostly from Ayn Rand and not actual macroeconomic thinking by actual economists.

I see truthiness and proofiness in abundance, but very little willingness by either "side" to roll up their sleeves and get to work on solutions, or, as President Obama said, to "grab a mop and help clean up the mess." Gandhi supposedly said, "There go my people. I must follow them, for I am their leader." I think we owe our leaders better than this to follow.

October 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterM. Edward (Ed) Borasky

I know many can't see this yet, but President Obama will broker peace in the Middle East next year ~ 2 months before he will be re-elected into office. That will be when everyone rolls up their sleeves!


Blessings ~

October 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterIN-B-TWEEN

You realize that it was a progressive President that created the Federal Reserve right? The critique of the Right is correct, but the Stockholm Syndrome felt for the left is troubling.

October 11, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRealPolitik

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>